Strong starting point
The responsible public body, regulator, company, product documentation, original research or qualified professional.
Accuracy and judgement
AI can produce fluent, confident writing without knowing whether every claim is true. Use this five-step check whenever a factual mistake would cost money, waste time, affect someone’s health or change an important decision.
The key idea
An AI answer can contain a correct explanation beside an invented quotation, an outdated rule or a link that does not support the claim. Asking the AI “Are you sure?” may produce another confident answer. Verification means leaving the chat and checking reliable evidence yourself.
A suggestion for a party game is low risk. Advice about symptoms, tax, benefits, investments, contracts, medication, electrical work or account security is high risk and needs an authoritative source or qualified person.
Repeatable method
Start with a fact you can check directly. You do not need an AI account for this exercise.
Claim to check
OpenAI publishes the official ChatGPT app for Android.
The claim was supported when this guide was checked on : OpenAI's help page links to the official app, and its Google Play listing names OpenAI. The evidence applies to that linked listing. A matching logo or a similar app name would not establish that a different app is official.
Mark the claim as unverified for now. A broken or inaccessible link does not establish whether a claim is true. Use another official route to the responsible organisation, or pause before acting.
This is a source-checking exercise, not a captured ChatGPT reply. Apply the same method to a factual claim in your own AI answer: identify it, find the responsible source, compare the wording and note what remains uncertain.
Worked example
Illustrative claim for practice
“Your passport always needs six months remaining when you travel abroad.”
This is an example claim to question, not a recorded AI response or a verified rule for your trip. Travel-document rules depend on the destination, passport type, issue date and travel dates. A safer process is:
The goal is to find the rule that applies to the actual journey.
Source quality
The responsible public body, regulator, company, product documentation, original research or qualified professional.
A reputable organisation that links clearly to its evidence and shows when the page was reviewed.
An AI summary, search snippet, anonymous post, copied article or citation you have not opened.
For money-related claims, confirm that a firm and its contact details match the Financial Conduct Authority register. For health concerns, use NHS information and contact an appropriate healthcare professional. In an emergency, use the official emergency route rather than an AI chat.
Helpful follow-up
Verification prompt
Separate your answer into: facts, assumptions, suggestions and points that may be out of date. For each factual claim, tell me what type of primary source should confirm it. Do not invent links or quotations.
This can organise your work, but it does not verify the answer. Open the sources yourself and compare the exact claim.
If the source contradicts the reply, use the verified information and explain the correction in the chat. If the evidence is missing or unclear, keep that uncertainty in your notes and avoid acting on the disputed claim.
Choose one factual claim from a reply you have received. Write down the claim, the original source you opened, what it actually says and what remains uncertain. A private paper note is enough; you do not need to submit your chat or personal details to Spinnit.
You can explain whether the source supports the exact claim, whether it applies to your situation and what you could not verify. If you could not find reliable evidence, saying “I have not verified this” is a valid result. Reading another confident AI answer is not a substitute for the source check.