Strong starting point
The responsible public body, regulator, company, product documentation, original research or qualified professional.
Accuracy and judgement
AI can produce fluent, confident writing without knowing whether every claim is true. Use this five-step check whenever a factual mistake would cost money, waste time, affect someone’s health or change an important decision.
The key idea
An AI answer can contain a correct explanation beside an invented quotation, an outdated rule or a link that does not support the claim. Asking the AI “Are you sure?” may produce another confident answer. Verification means leaving the chat and checking reliable evidence yourself.
A suggestion for a party game is low risk. Advice about symptoms, tax, benefits, investments, contracts, medication, electrical work or account security is high risk and needs an authoritative source or qualified person.
Repeatable method
Worked example
AI answer
“Your passport always needs six months remaining when you travel abroad.”
This sounds simple but travel-document rules depend on the destination, passport type, issue date and travel dates. A safer process is:
The goal is not to make the AI rewrite the claim more persuasively. It is to find the rule that applies to the actual journey.
Source quality
The responsible public body, regulator, company, product documentation, original research or qualified professional.
A reputable organisation that links clearly to its evidence and shows when the page was reviewed.
An AI summary, search snippet, anonymous post, copied article or citation you have not opened.
For money-related claims, confirm that a firm and its contact details match the Financial Conduct Authority register. For health concerns, use NHS information and contact an appropriate healthcare professional. In an emergency, use the official emergency route rather than an AI chat.
Helpful follow-up
Verification prompt
Separate your answer into: facts, assumptions, suggestions and points that may be out of date. For each factual claim, tell me what type of primary source should confirm it. Do not invent links or quotations.
This can organise your work, but it does not verify the answer. Open the sources yourself and compare the exact claim.